Archive for the ‘Box Office’ Category

Box office 2018: A Year of No Flops?

July 19, 2018

Box office 2018: A Year of No Flops?

There have been some really big movie hits so far this year! We track the “most profitable” movies in this IMDb list:

2018 The Measured Circle’s Most Profitable Movies

That’s based on dogro (domestic gross) versus the production budget.

The most profitable movies by percentage don’t tend to be the most expensive to make…but this year, certainly, some expensive movies have been worth the investment.

  • Black Panther has an estimated production budget of $200 million…and has received our “Golden” award, for dogroing at least three times that. That’s not at all common for movies which cost over $100m to make, although it does happen (especially for Disney/Marvel movies)
  • Avengers: Infinity War, with an estimated production budget of $300 million, has profited over $300 million

Another category in the past few years has been relatively low budget movies which go on to break $100 million dogro. This year, A Quiet Place has a reported budget of $17 million, and has received our “Triple Golden” award (its dogro is more than 900 percent of its production budget).

However, something which has particularly stood out to me this year is the absence of what we call “Underperformers”: movies which dogro less than 50% of their production budgets.

After the Fourth of July weekend, there weren’t any.

While you might have guessed that A Wrinkle in Time, Rampage, or Ready Player One might have been on that list, they’ve all dogroed more than 50%.

Let’s compare that to other recent years.

2017: 2018 is continuing the trend of 2017, which had no underperformers at the end of the year.


Underperformer Sub-40s (budget at least $40.0m):

Gods of Egypt $31.1m (reported budget: $140.0m) | USA release date: 02/26/16 The Finest Hours $27.6m (reported budget: $80.0m) | USA release date 01/29/16 Ben-Hur $26.4m (reported budget: $100.0m) | USA release date 08/19/16 Free State of Jones $20.8m (reported budget: $50.0m) | USA release date 06/24/16 Keeping Up with the Joneses $14.9m (reported budget: $40.0m) | USA release date 10/21/16


Underachiever Sub-40s (prodbud at least $40.0m)

Seventh Son: $17.2m (reported budget: $95.0m) Blackhat: $7.9m (reported budget: $70.0m) Mortdecai: $7.7m (reported budget: $60.0m) The Last Witch Hunter $27.1m (reported budget: $90.0m) Pan $34.8m (reported budget: $150.0m) In the Heart of the Sea: $25.0m (reported budget: $100.0m) Point Break: $28.7m (reported budget: $105m)


Underachiever Sub-40s (budget at least $40.0m):

The Legend of Hercules: $18.8m= (reported budget: $70.0m) 27% I, Frankenstein: $19.1m (reported budget: $65.0m) 29% Transcendence: $23.0m (reported budget: $100.0m) 23% Pompeii $23.2m (reported budget: $100.0m) 23% Winter’s Tale $12.6m (reported budget: $60.0m) 21% Legends of Oz: Dorothy’s Return $8.5m (reported budget: $70.0m) 12%


We hadn’t by this point made the listing quite so easy to copy and paste, but there were severaL

  • Jack the Giant Slayer (34%)
  • After Earth (47%)
  • White House Down (49% when we last updated it….so it might have made it)
  • The Lone Ranger (42%)

It looks like 2018 proves that 2017 wasn’t a fluke…a flopless fluke, I suppose. ūüėČ

What’s the reason?

My guess is that there are a few factors:

  • Movie studios may have become more cautious about what they release…there is a lot of competition now, and a lot of post-release value in movies. You want something that people want to stream later: a middling box office movie likely will be seen as a reasonable choice to watch at home, but a giant flop might not be
  • There are more data available to use to predict success…and it wouldn’t surprise me if algorithms are part of the prediction process
  • The studios have started to expand the audience, in part by elevating the prominence of the portrayal and production participation of various minority groups (not just ethnic)

I think it’s unlikely that we’ll see years in the near future with very many underperformers.

One other factor to note: the power of the international box office for American releases has been growing. In 2017, we added a “Road Winner” award, for movies that have at least 67% of their box office (according to BoxOfficeMojo) from “foreign” box office. That doesn’t change the Underperformer award, which is based just on dogro…but similar to the post-release value I mentioned above, a movie may do better in foreign markets if it did reasonably well in the domestic market.

I don’t think the strategy of going for “in the ballpark base hits” rather than swinging for the home run and increasing your strikeout risk has reduced innovation. The success of those low budget horror movies is based solidly on innovation…Get Out and A Quiet Place are well-made, original stories.

It will be interesting to see what happens going forward. Oh, and of course, knock virtual wood! ūüėČ

See you in the movies!


Join thousands of readers and try the free The Measured Circle magazine at Flipboard !

All aboard our The Measured Circle’s Geek Time Trip at The History Project! Join the TMCGTT Timeblazers!

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.


Deadpool’s ROI is already 233%, beating all Marvel movies except…

February 14, 2016

Deadpool’s ROI is already 233%, beating all Marvel movies except…

Ryan Reynold’s R-rated Marvel superhero movie,¬†Deadpool, has gotten off to a terrific start!

BoxOfficeMojo reports a weekend estimate (not counting Monday) of $135m dogro (domestic gross).

That’s really high, but it’s even more impressive when you consider that it was a relatively low budgeted movie for this genre, at $58m.

There were a lot of risks with it: the R-rating, Ryan Reynolds (who had had a disappointing starring role as DC’s Green Lantern before), the fact that it was in February, the lack of name recognition for the character (outside of the geek ¬†community), the fact that this a 20th Century Fox movie (not a Disney Marvel movie), the weather back East…

This, though, is showing that Reynolds’ (who is also a producer) really hard work promoting the movie, as well as a solid marketing campaign, has paid off.

$135m is 233% of $58m (earning Deadpool The Measured Circle Award of “Money”)…and it’s¬†just getting started.

Let’s compare that to other Marvel superhero movies.

Movie Budget Dogro Return
Spider-Man 139 409 294.24%
Marvel’s The Avengers 220 623 283.18%
Deadpool 58 135 232.76%
Iron Man 140 318 227.14%
X-Men 75 157 209.33%
Iron Man 3 200 409 204.50%
Guardians of the Galaxy 170 333 195.88%
X2: X-Men United 110 215 195.45%
Spider-Man 2 200 374 187.00%
Avengers: Age of Ultron 250 459 183.60%
Iron Man 2 200 312 156.00%
Captain America: The Winter Soldier 170 260 152.94%
Ant-Man 130 180 138.46%
Spider-Man 3 258 337 130.62%
Captain America: The First Avenger 140 176 125.71%
Thor: The Dark World 170 206 121.18%
Thor 150 181 120.67%
X-Men Origins: Wolverine 150 180 120.00%
X-Men: Days of Future Past 200 234 117.00%
The Amazing Spider-Man 230 262 113.91%
X-Men: The Last Stand 210 234 111.43%
The Wolverine 120 132 110.00%
X-Men: First Class 160 146 91.25%
The Incredible Hulk 150 134 89.33%
The Amazing Spider-Man 2 255 202 79.22%

That’s right…you would have gotten a better return on your investment on Deadpool than on any other Marvel movies except Spider-Man and The Avengers…and at a much smaller initial investment.

This is based on BoxOfficeMojo’s reported production budget versus their reported domestic gross (dogro). There are other expenses (including the marketing budget) and other income (including international gross), but this lets us do a consistent comparison (the other data is harder to get).

The odds are good that Deadpool will be the best ROI Marvel movie…by Tuesday. Not the highest grossing, or with the biggest profit, but big congratulations to Ryan Reynolds, Fox, and the rest of the team!

Join thousands of readers and try the free The Measured Circle magazine at Flipboard 


This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the  The Measured Circle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy  Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.

The Year Ahead in Movies: 2016

January 7, 2016

The Year Ahead in Movies: 2016

There is a lot to happen yet for movies released in 2015.

Some movies will still¬†make significant money…there are some which will make more than half of their box office in 2016. That’s why we keep tracking them in

at least until no 2015 release is in the top 10…which last year was months into 2015. This year, it wouldn’t surprise me if The Force Awakens is still a domestic box office force (so to speak) into the summer blockbuster release period. Daddy’s Home and Sisters are strong rolling into the new year, and the Revenant and The Hateful Eight have just gotten started.

Oscar nominations (and to a lesser degree, other awards) can also affect it.

With the first releases coming this Friday, though, it’s a good time to look ahead.

2015 was the biggest USA box office year to date…and it’s quite likely it will be bested in 2016.

That’s not to say that any movie will have the excitement and cultural impact of The Force Awakens…I don’t see that happening.

However, when they figure the box office for the year, it’s not based on movies just released that year…it’s movies in the theatre that year.

Last year, American Sniper, released in 2014, contributed significantly to the 2015 box office.

This year, the same thing will happen with The Force Awakens…but even more so.

I expect The Force Awakens to make more than half of its domestic box office in 2016…which would make it one of the biggest movies of both years. One reason for that? I think Disney will keep it in theatres, and even “re-release” it maybe twice (it will really be resurges). I could see them running it as a midnight show all year. Then, resurging it (maybe with the first Star Wars movie from 1977) on May 4th (Star Wars Day “May the 4th be with you”) and as a boost for Rogue One, the first Star Wars “anthology” movie in December. Rogue One is very important to Disney’s strategy of releasing a main story movie in odd numbered years, and an anthology movie in even numbered years. If R1 flopped (it won’t) that would be a strategic challenge.

I’m confident that January 2016 will be a record January, and I think that winning streak will likely extend into February.

What about other movies?

One interesting lesson from 2015 was that delayed sequels can work very well…better, arguably, than reboots or immediate sequels (although some of the latter were very profitable). With a delayed sequel, you can still respect the movies people remember, while introducing new elements. The Force Awakens did that very well, but so did 2015’s second most profitable movie, Jurassic World

2015 The Measured Circle’s Most Profitable Movies

Based on that, we might expect big things out of delayed sequels, notably Independence Day: Resurgent and Finding Dory (the sequel to Finding Nemo).

However, I think there may be more to it than simply being a delayed sequel. I suspect that having less-well received sequels (or prequels) may also be part of it…a good delayed sequel can be seen as a redemption. I’m guessing people might be looking at a sequel to Jaws…

What about the new Ghostbusters? Well, it’s not really clear yet if that is a reboot, or a delayed sequel…some of the original stars are credited for the new one, but we don’t know how significant their roles will be (the original Star Wars cast was very featured in the Force Awakens, and B.D. ¬†Wong significantly returned to the role of Dr. Henry Wu in Jurassic World).

Let’s quickly define some terms the way we use them, then take a look at a selection of other movies which will be released in the USA in 2016. Oh, and let me first explain why we are looking at the USA.

Certainly, the rest of the world is important to the movie box office…in a typical week, the top ten box office ¬†movies worldwide include some which are not having an impact in the USA, and may not even have been released into theatres there.

Some American movies do better around  the world than others. Typically, less dialog is a good thing: action movies do better globally than comedies do. Humor, in particular, can be culture dependent, since it tends to refer to shared pop culture and experiences.

It’s simply that it is easier to focus on one country, and I can give you a more complete picture. I am in the USA, and even though it is definitely not the whole of what happens in the world with moviegoers, it does tend to have the biggest slice of the top movies.

Looking at the top ten right now, based on the

Rentrak numbers

seven of the top ten worldwide releases right now are American movies.

So, if you have to cover one country, the USA is the most representative.

Okay, those quick definitions:

  • Sequel: continues a story chronologically
  • Prequel: part of the same story, but happens prior to what we’ve seen before
  • Sidequel: in the same “universe” as what we know, but focusing on different characters or events…not part of the same through story
  • Delayed sequel: a sequel released after a significant gap of time (let’s call it at least five years)…this is a new definition for us this year
  • Remake: retelling a story, using the same characters and basic plot
  • Reboot: new actors, and may not follow the same rules as the previous work
  • Pedigeeked originals: original stories with filmmakers who have significant geek-friendly credits, or based on geek-friendly works (books, TV shows, toys, and so on)

Here we go!

Happy New Fear!

January has been a good month in recent years for one horror movie to make our list with at least $40m dogro…so that suggests that¬†The Forest¬†should do fairly well…although it could be¬†The Boy¬†later this month (or both).

Superhero round-up

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice¬†can’t help but open big on March 26th…but I have to say, the trailers have not convinced me. Is this a $200m dogro movie? Sure. Is it a $500m movie? I wouldn’t bet on it.

The other big DC movie is¬†Suicide Squad. While we can say this is a supervillain rather than a superhero movie, it feels a lot buzzier and original to me…this could be one of the top ten movies this year.

Over on the Marvel side, there are five (!) based on the comic books pictures:

  • Captain America: Civil War…expensive to make and an all-star movie, as well as introducing Black Panther. This is going to dogro a lot of money (as well as succeeding internationally)…but may not be the most profitable movie (Age of Ultron was number four on our 2015 The Measured Circle’s Most Profitable Movies, behind The Force Awakens, Jurassic World, and Minions)
  • X-Men: Apocalypse: directed by series auteur Bryan Singer, starring Jennifer Lawrence and The Force Awakens Oscar Isaac, this may do better than some might guess
  • Gambit: Channing Tatum
  • Doctor Strange: not your typical Marvel superhero, and with a different tone, this one does star Benedict Cumberbatch. Guardians of the Galaxy were less well-known, but that movie did very well. It’s not as big a question mark as…
  • Deadpool: an R-rated movie, starring someone whose last superhero movie did not win the hearts and dollars of the public, this one is clearly a risk. It’s unlikely that anyone else has promoted a movie as much as Ryan Reynolds has promoted this one, and it is going to have some X-Men crossover…but we just have to hope it doesn’t do to Marvel movies what Abbott & Costello did to the Universal Horror movies. I think that’s unlikely, but I could see this ending up with under $120m dogro

Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles are neither Marvel nor DC, but are comic book superheroes. This sequel to 2014’s reboot should break $100m, even if it doesn’t match the $190m of its predecessor.


  • Star Trek Beyond: to quote the classic “other”, “I’ve got a bad feeling about this.” I want it to do well, I really do, but I’m unconvinced by the trailers or by the choice of someone perceived as an action movie director (Justin Lin of several Fast & Furious movies, but not the emotional most recent one). Star Trek has action, but is not an action franchise
  • Kung Fu Panda 3: it will clearly be popular
  • Ice Age: Collision Course
  • Now You See Me 2: is this going to capture the success of the first one? That would be pulling a rabbit out of a hat…part of the success of the first movie was due to the novelty and surprise, and that’s hard to replicate
  • The Divergent Series: Allegiant…YA adaptations have entered that awkward stage, but this series has done acceptably well
  • The Huntsman Winter’s War: an odd duck sequel without¬†its top-billed star, but with a geek-friendly cast…this one risks being an underachiever in the USA, but should do well internationally and in secondary distribution (especially streaming services)
  • Alice Through the Looking Glass: Johnny Depp got respect for Black Mass in 2015, but has been a risk at the box office in the past few years (see¬†Will Into the Woods reverse the Depp¬†Dip?¬†for details, ¬†including a graph). Again, this can rely on international box office and streaming, but could be between $100m and $200m in dogro
  • Finding Dory: the sequel to Finding Nemo isn’t a guaranteed superhit, but should do quite well, especially with the promotional push from Ellen DeGeneres. This may look like a rebound from The Good Dinosaur, which still did fine. $300m? Yes, quite possible. $500m? Feels unlikely
  • Ride Along 2: this isn’t going for a homerun, and should hit its goals
  • Inferno: this fits our definition of a delayed sequel…it’s been five years since Angels & Demons, the last time Ron Howard directed Tom Hanks as Robert Langdon. Angels & Demons was not as well received as The Da Vinci Code…hm, I don’t feel the buzz, but this may outperform expectation
  • Matt Damon as Jason Bourne: it doesn’t have a title at time of writing, but does have Damon working with director Paul Greengrass again…it’s only been four years since The Bourne Legacy, but feels like a delayed sequel
  • Neighbors 2: Sorority Rising: it should meet its expectations…not beating its ancestor, but making a profit
  • Jack Reacher: Never Go Back. Don’t look at dogro on this, look at worldwide
  • Other sequels include: The Conjuring 2; Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon: Sword of Destiny; Barbershop: the Next Cut; The Adventures of Tintin: Prisoners of the¬†Sun; The Purge 3; God’s Not Dead 2; Underworld 5; Bad Santa 2; Zoolander 2; My Big Fat Greek Wedding 2

Perhaps more to come in a part 2. I want to at least address January releases before they hit the theatres, and this is long enough for now. ūüôā

January wide releases:

  • The Forest: January horror, maybe $40m to $80m
  • The Revenant released in 2015, should get boosted by Oscar noms and other awards…likely to go over $100m dogro
  • 13 Hours: The Secret Soldiers of Benghazi: directed by Michael Bay, no box office stars (but not unknowns), tied up in politics, rated R…I could see this not doing well
  • Norm of the North: the first kids’ animated movie of the year, should do respectably, but I don’t expect a big hit
  • Ride Along 2: will hit its goals
  • The 5th Wave: YA adaptation…I think Chloe Grace Moretz is terrific, but I have my doubts on this one
  • The Boy: January horror, I like the commercials…maybe $80m to $100m?
  • Dirty Grandpa: Robert DeNiro and Zac Efron in an R-rated comedy…I’m iffy on this. Efron hasn’t been box office gold, and DeNiro is everything…great box office, and lesser performers (but that doesn’t mean lesser performances as an actor). I think this may be more of a secondary market movie
  • Fifty Shades of Black: parody comedy with Marlon Wayons…this one is very likely to be golden (dogro three time production budget)
  • The Finest Hours…feels like a serious movie for a January about an historical rescue. I’m thinking it’s not getting to my $80m slot, and could maybe get to the $40m
  • Jane Got a Gun: Natalie Portman is a star and producer of this Weinstein Company Western…I’d put it the dogro around $60m, although it could go considerably higher or lower
  • Kung Fu Panda 3: should be solid…I’d see it as $150m plus, but not $300m

I don’t usually make specific predictions like this, and it will be interesting to see how I do. ūüôā

Join thousands of readers and try the free The Measured Circle magazine at Flipboard 

* I am linking to the same thing at the regular Amazon site, and at AmazonSmile. When you shop at AmazonSmile, half a percent of your purchase price on eligible items goes to a non-profit you choose. It will feel just like shopping at Amazon: you’ll be using your same account. The one thing for you that is different is that you pick a non-profit the first time you go (which you can change whenever you want)…and the good feeling you’ll get. :) Shop ’til you help! :) 

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the  The Measured Circle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy  Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.

Mid-year box office check 2015

August 2, 2015

Mid-year box office check 2015

We’ve gone through six months of the year, so it’s a good time to look at how the box office is going (based on movies released in the USA through the end of June).

It’s entirely possible that this year will have the largest dogro (domestic gross) to date (not adjusted for inflation), especially since there are some really big movies yet to come.

Breaking it down, what do we see?

Jennifer Lopez is a movie star

That might not be the lead in stories you’ll see in other publications about this year at the movies, but the success of The Boy Next Door is staggering, and largely due to J.Lo.

Oh, I’m sure some of you want to jump in and say that Chris Pratt is a bigger star.

Well, The Boy Next Door has a dogro of $35.4m on a reported production budget of $4.0m. That’s a return of 885%, nearly triple golden in our awards system.

It did that in part because of its star’s (and sorry, John Corbett and Kristen Chenoweth, but I doubt very many people¬†went to see the movie who weren’t¬†significantly interested in seeing J.Lo) smart and relentless promotion, appearing on TV shows, in magazines, and so on.

Universal has it figured out

Universal is one of the most geek-friendly studios ever (along with Hammer in England, and AIP). Of course, they had the famous horror cycle starting with Boris Karloff in Frankenstein and Bela Lugosi in Dracula, and continuing in that cycle until they may have killed it with Abbott and Costello Meets fill-in-the-blank. The list goes on and on from The Creature from the Black Lagoon and The Incredible Shrinking Man, to their relationship with Steven Spielberg, bringing us Jaws and E.T. This year, four of the top 5 of

The Measured Circle’s Most Profitable Movies

at time of writing are from Universal:

  • Jurassic World ($478m in profit, domestic gross ((dogro)) versus production budget…419%)
  • Minions ($201m in profit | 372%)
  • Furious Seven ($160m in profit ¬†| 184%)
  • Pitch Perfect 2 ($154m in profit | 631%)

Those are four very different movies, with different target audiences. Yes, they are all sequels/prequels, but that’s certainly no guarantee of success (for an example from this year, Hot Tub Time Machine 2 didn’t domestically make back its budget…which was $14m). They did have a couple of misfires (Blackhat and Seventh Son), but they’ve more than made up for it.

So does Blumhouse

Universal has been investing money, and getting a return on it. Blumhouse, on the other hand, spends very little money…but has a higher percentage return than Universal…and they’ve been doing that for years. Looking at 2015:

  • The Lazarus Effect ($25.8m dogro on a $3.3m production budget | 782%)
  • Insidious: Chapter 3 ($52m dogro on a $10m production budget | 520%)
  • The Gallows ($21.9m on a $100,000 production budget | 21,580%) (note: this was released July 10th, so it’s past our cut-off…but it’s still a stand-out, so we’ll cheat a little) ūüėČ

Golden movies on our list

To get to our list, a movie has to dogro at least $40m. We also give awards to movies, based on their returns…at least 300% return is “Golden” (double, and this is still dogro versus production budget, is “Money”). These movies are Golden this year:

  • Pitch Perfect 2 Double Golden (at least 600% return)
  • Jurassic World (highly unusual¬†that a movie with a $150m budget to go Golden)
  • Minions
  • Fifty Shades of Grey
  • Magic Mike XXL
  • Insidious: Chapter 3

The $500 Million Club

We also track

The Measured Circle’s Box Office MVPs

To get on the list, an actor needs to be first billed in a movie that dogros at least $100m, and appear in at least one other movie that dogros $40m.

Eleven actors are on that list, and six of them have had movies on our list that dogroed at least $500m this year:

  1. Judy Greer: Jurassic World ($628.0m); Tomorrowland ($91.8m); Ant-Man ($120.0m) | Tentative total: $839.8m
  2. Hayley Atwell: Cinderella ($201.0m); Avengers: Age of Ultron ($456.0m); Ant-Man ($120.0m) | Tentative total: $777.0m
  3. BD Wong: Jurassic World ($628.0m); Focus ($53.8m) | Tentative total: $681.8m
  4. Stellan Skarsgård: Cinderella ($201.0m); Avengers: Age of Ultron ($456.0m) | Tentative total: $657.0m
  5. Samuel L. Jackson: Kingsman: The Secret Service ($128.0m); Avengers: Age of Ultron ($456.0m) | Tentative total: $584.0m
  6. Dwayne Johnson: Furious 7 ($350.0m); San Andreas ($151.0m) | Tentative total: $501.0m

Of these six, only Samuel L. Jackson is repeating from 2014…although Dwayne Johnson was on the list for 2013.

There you are…halfway through the year, and there is a lot more coming!

Join thousands of readers and try the free The Measured Circle magazine at Flipboard 

* I am linking to the same thing at the regular Amazon site, and at AmazonSmile. When you shop at AmazonSmile, half a percent of your purchase price on eligible items goes to a non-profit you choose. It will feel just like shopping at Amazon: you’ll be using your same account. The one thing for you that is different is that you pick a non-profit the first time you go (which you can change whenever you want)…and the good feeling you’ll get. :) Shop ’til you help! :) 

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the  The Measured Circle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy  Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.


2015 February geeky movie preview

February 4, 2015

2015 February geeky movie preview

We have already stated confidently that this year will have more $400 million plus dogroing (domestic grossing) movies than ever before.

One consequence of so many blockbusters is that they have to be spread out more throughout the year. Once a Star Wars or Avengers or Jurassic movie claims a weekend, well, you have to be either really brave or really counter-programming to go up against it.

So, you have to run for another weekend.

Some movies, of course, run out of time…and actually move to the next year.

Still, we think you may see several record months this year, as movies which might have gotten a prime slot in a past year shift backwards or forwards.

Let’s take a look at some of the geeky movies scheduled for release this month, February 2015:

February 6

Jupiter Ascending

Directed and written by the Wachowskis (The Matrix), and starring Channing Tatum, Mila Kunis, and Eddie Redmayne (who may win an Oscar for Best Actor while this is in theatres), it’s a big science fiction wide release spectacle.

The Wachowskis have arguably been coasting on The Matrix (and its offshoots), but this PG-13 movie may succeed on its own.

Seventh Son

Julianne Moore (another possible Oscar winner who would have a geeky movie in the theatres at the time), Jeff Bridges, Jason Scott Lee stars. Inspired by The Spook’s Apprentice by Joseph Delaney.

Not opening in as many theatres (but still a wide release), and won’t get the comparisons to Guardians of the Galaxy (but might to Into the Woods…you know, they both have a witch), this one is a bit of a longer shot than Jupiter.

The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge Out of Water

The most theatres of the bunch and budgeted at a moderate $66m, this could be the most profitable big movie of the weekend. Kids’ movies tend to have long legs (they keep making money for a long time), so if you’d had to invest in of these three, this might have been the safest bet. It doesn’t have the same blockbuster potential (even with Antonio Banderas as a guest voice), but should make Paramount happy.

February 13 

Kingsman: The Secret Service

Spy spoof with Colin Firth, Mark Hamill, Michael Caine, Samuel L. Jackson…and they have been promoting it a lot. Hard to tell with this one, but it may open big. 1st place this weekend is likely going to Fifty Shades of Grey, though.

What We Do in the Shadows

Small imported (from New Zealand) horror comedy with vampire flatmates. Some folks will love it…more of an arthouse picture.

February 20

Hot Tub Time Machine 2

The gang is mostly back (no John Cusack…see Maps to the Stars, below) in a sequel to the $50m grossing 2010 comedy. I’d say it would be a surprise for this to get to $100m dogro…but probably doesn’t need to do that to be a success.

February 27

The Lazarus Effect

Horror movie directed by David Gelb (Jiro Dreams of Sushi), and featuring Evan Peters, Olivia Wilde, Sarah Bolger, and Mark Duplass. We wish every movie well, but are concerned that this one may underperform expectations.

Maps to the Stars (2014)

David Cronenberg with a low $16m budgeted movie, and a cast including Julianne Moore (who will therefore likely have two movies in theatres at the same time), Mia Wasikowska, Robert Pattinson, and John Cusack. This one won’t be expected to have a huge dogro…this is art, people. ūüėČ

Not bad for a 28 day month! Now, about March…

Join thousands of readers and try the free The Measured Circle magazine at Flipboard

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the  The Measured Circle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy  Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.

Who is really winning the box office?

September 4, 2014

Who is really winning the box office?

You have probably seen all those stories touting Guardians of the Galaxy as the biggest money making movie of the year so far.

You may even have thought to yourself, “I wish I’d had a piece of that!”

Well, while a profit (production budget versus domestic gross) of $111 million is certainly impressive (and there is more to come), it only puts it fifth so far on our list of most profitable movies of 2014:

Yes, it’s beaten by the following:

  1. The Lego Movie ($198 million profit)
  2. 22 Jump Street ($141m profit)
  3. Neighbors ($132m profit)
  4. The Fault in Our Stars ($113m profit)

It is likely to pass $300 million dogro. Last year, there were four movies that did…and three of them went over $400m.

If we go back to the idea of investing, though, even these numbers don’t show you the whole picture.

Let’s pretend that you had a million dollars to invest in the production of a movie.

It’s just going to be the production budget: the studio will take care of marketing (and will get any merchandising money).

This is strictly an American deal…domestic box office only.

For your one million, you’ll split a share of the profit.

If a movie costs $100 million to make (so there were 100 one million dollar shares out there), and it dogroed (had a domestic gross of) $200 million, you’d get $1 million back for your investment.

Looking at it that way, Guardians is way down on the list…it cost so much to make!

You would have made a lot more money investing in Tammy, for example, which I’ve seen described elsewhere inexplicably as having “tanked”.

Tammy cost $20 million to make, and has dogroed to date $83.8 million…you would have gotten $3.19 million back for your investment of $1 million.

How much would you get back from Guardians so far?


Tammy would have been nearly five times as profitable for you.

Looking at movies that dogroed at least $40 million, here are the ones that would have made a profit for you, with what your return would have been:

  1. God’s Not Dead $29.4 million
  2. The Fault in Our Stars $9.42 million
  3. Neighbors $7.33 million
  4. The Purge: Anarchy $6.90 million
  5. Heaven Is for Real $6.62 million
  6. Ride Along $4.36 million
  7. The Lego Movie $3.3 million
  8. Tammy $3.19 million
  9. About Last Night $2.88 million
  10. 22 Jump Street $2.82 million
  11. Let’s Be Cops $2.5 million
  12. Lucy $1.98 million
  13. Think Like a Man Too $1.72 million
  14. The Other Woman $1.1 million
  15. The Hundred-Foot Journey $880,000
  16. Non-Stop $830,000
  17. Divergent $776,000
  18. Guardians of the Galaxy $650,000
  19. The Nut Job $530,000
  20. Captain America: The Winter Soldier $530,000
  21. Maleficent $330,000
  22. Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles $330,000
  23. Rio 2 $280,000
  24. Godzilla $250,000
  25. Transformers: Age of Extinction $220,000
  26. Dawn of the Planet of the Apes $210,000
  27. How to Train Your Dragon 2 $200,000
  28. X-Men: Days of Future Past $170,000
  29. Jersey Boys $170,000
  30. Planes: Fire & Rescue: $160,000
  31. Blended $160,000
  32. The Monuments Men $110,000
  33. A Million Ways to Die in the West $70,000
  34. Muppets Most Wanted $20,000

Let’s also say that they take your $1 million as an investment…but don’t make you responsible for any more than that. In other words, if a movie isn’t at break even, you don’t have to make up the difference.

The following movies that dogroed at least $40 million have not made up their production budgets yet:

  • 300: Rise of an Empire 96%
  • Into the Storm 85.4%
  • Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit 84%
  • Noah 81%
  • Mr. Peabody & Sherman 77%
  • Hercules 71%
  • Need for Speed 66%
  • Robocop 59%
  • Edge of Tomorrow 56%

For this last group that made it on our list by having a dogro of at least $40 million, we don’t have reported budgets.

  • The Amazing Spider-Man 2 dogro=$203 million
  • Son of God $59.7 million
  • The Grand Budapest Hotel $59.1 million

Clearly, some of these are going to still make significant money, and there are big money makers yet to come in the year.

Looking at this list, though, the message is clear: the biggest budget movies would not¬†always be the best return on your investment…even if they also make the most money.

Join more than a thousand readers and try the free The Measured Circle magazine at Flipboard

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the  The Measured Circle blog. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy  Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.

2013 The Year in Movie Box Office

December 29, 2013

2013 The Year in Movie Box Office

While I would be surprised if this year stands out in the history of movies the way that last year did, it was certainly interesting!

In this post, we’re going to do some analysis of the box office.

We have to first point out that the list isn’t final, and that there are some newcomers which will move up considerably (The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug is still burning up the box office, and for a movie with a snowman main character, Frozen surprisingly has legs). ūüėČ We think that American Hustle could eventually top $100 million dogro (domestic gross), and Walter Mitty and Anchorman 2 are just getting started.

We’ll continue to update our 2013 box office page

2013 Movie Box Office: 40, 80, 1, 2 , 3

at least until no 2013 release appears on the IMDb top ten box office list for a week. If that happens before the Oscars (which are scheduled for March 2), we’ll probably keep going until then…the Oscar bump can have an impact.

That said, let’s look at where we are as of now. We are only doing this on dogro, although we’ll have something to say about international later. We also cut it off at the bottom at $40 million:

1 Iron Man 3 $409,013,994.00
2 The Hunger Games: Catching Fire $384,324,000.00
3 Despicable Me 2 $367,607,660.00
4 Man of Steel $291,045,518.00
5 Monsters University $268,492,764.00
6 Gravity $254,067,000.00
7 Fast & Furious 6 $238,679,850.00
8 Oz The Great and Powerful $234,911,825.00
9 Frozen (2013) $229,775,000.00
10 Star Trek Into Darkness $228,778,661.00
11 World War Z $202,359,711.00
12 Thor: The Dark World $201,727,537.00
13 The Croods $187,168,425.00
14 The Hobbit: The Desolation of Smaug $170,564,000.00
15 The Heat $159,582,188.00
16 We’re the Millers $150,394,119.00
17 The Great Gatsby (2013) $144,840,419.00
18 The Conjuring $137,400,141.00
19 Identity Thief $134,506,920.00
20 Grown Ups 2 $133,668,525.00
21 The Wolverine $132,556,852.00
22 G.I. Joe: Retaliation $122,523,060.00
23 Now You See Me $117,723,989.00
24 Lee Daniels’ The Butler $116,146,955.00
25 Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs 2 $115,740,196.00
26 The Hangover Part III $112,200,072.00
27 Epic $107,518,682.00
28 Captain Phillips $104,287,640.00
29 Pacific Rim $101,802,906.00
30 This is the End $101,470,202.00
31 Jackass Presents: Bad Grandpa $100,837,000.00
32 Olympus Has Fallen $98,925,640.00
33 $42.00 $95,020,213.00
34 Elysium $93,050,117.00
35 Planes $90,288,712.00
36 The Lone Ranger $89,302,115.00
37 Oblivion $89,107,235.00
38 Insidious Chapter 2 $83,586,447.00
39 Turbo $83,028,128.00
40 2 Guns $75,612,460.00
41 White House Down $73,103,784.00
42 Mama $71,628,180.00
43 Safe Haven $71,349,120.00
44 Anchorman 2: The Legend Continues $71,198,000.00
45 The Smurfs 2 $71,017,784.00
46 The Best Man Holiday $70,033,270.00
47 Percy Jackson: Sea of Monsters $68,443,727.00
48 A Good Day to Die Hard $67,349,198.00
49 Warm Bodies $66,380,662.00
50 Jack the Giant Slayer $65,187,603.00
51 The Purge $64,473,115.00
52 Last Vegas $62,439,761.00
53 Prisoners $61,002,302.00
54 Ender’s Game $60,900,026.00
55 After Earth $60,522,097.00
56 Escape From Planet Earth $57,012,977.00
57 Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters $55,703,475.00
58 Evil Dead (2013) $54,239,856.00
59 Free Birds $54,089,000.00
60 Red 2 $53,262,560.00
61 Tyler Perry’s Temptation: Confessions of a Marriage Counselor $51,975,354.00
62 The Call $51,872,378.00
63 Pain and Gain $49,875,291.00
64 American Hustle $46,885,000.00
65 Gangster Squad $46,000,903.00
66 Jurassic Park 3D $45,385,935.00
67 The Internship $44,672,764.00
68 Instructions Not Included $44,467,206.00
69 Snitch $42,930,462.00
70 Riddick $42,025,135.00
71 A Haunted House $40,041,683.00

Some movies which may still make $40 million dogro:

  • Tyler Perry’s a Madea Christmas
  • 12 Years a Slave (especially with an Oscar bump, but even without)
  • Saving Mr. Banks
  • The Wolf of Wall Street
  • The Secret Life of Walter Mitty
  • 47 Ronin
  • There are some that could do it with an Oscar bump, for example, Philomena and Fruitvale Station

Counting Gravity as a geek-friendly movie (even though Gravity is not science fiction), the top 14 all qualify.

That’s just based on gross, though. Geek movies often cost more to produce, which reduces the profit. When we look at

The Measured Circle’s Most Profitable Movies of 2013

the top ten looks considerably different.

  1. Despicable Me 2: profit of $292m to date
  2. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire: $209m
  3. Iron Man 3: $209m
  4. Gravity: $154m
  5. Monsters University: $153m
  6. The Conjuring: $124m
  7. The Heat: $117m
  8. We’re the Millers: $113m
  9. Identity Thief: $99m
  10. Lee Daniels’ The Butler: $86m

As you can see, three comedies and a mainstream drama make the cut with those numbers (dogro versus reported production budget).

Like last year, the biggest losers were all geek friendly:

  1. Jack the Giant Slayer: -$129.8m to date
  2. The Lone Ranger: -$125.7m
  3. Pacific Rim: -$88.0m

We don’t know yet where 47 Ronin might end up, with an estimated budget of $175m…it is possible it will lose as much as Pacific Rim, but it is too soon to tell.

This year, we started a new feature. We label movies based on their dogro versus their reported production budgets:

A traditional measure of success if the dogro being twice the production budget. Using that as a starting point…

Dogro 2X production budget = ‚ÄúMoney‚ÄĚ
Dogro 3X production budget = ‚ÄúGolden‚ÄĚ

Dogro less than 50% of production budget = ‚ÄúUnderperformer‚ÄĚ

Here are those groupings:

Golden (16 titles out of 69 tracked by us so far)

  1. Septuple Golden: The Purge: 2147%
  2. Quintuple Golden: Insidious: Chapter 2: 1,672%
  3. Quintuple Golden: A Haunted House: 1,600%
  4. Triple Golden: The Conjuring: 1053%
  5. Double Golden: Instructions Not Include: 890%
  6. Double Golden: Jackass Presents Bad Grandpa: 673%
  7. Despicable Me 2: 484%
  8. Mama: 477%
  9. The Best Man Holiday: 411%
  10. We’re the Millers: 405%
  11. The Call: 392%
  12. Lee Daniels’ The Butler: 387%
  13. Evil Dead: 387%
  14. Identity Thief: 383%
  15. The Heat: 372%
  16. This Is the End: 316%

Money (7 titles out of 69)

  1. Snitch: 286%
  2. Safe Haven: 255%
  3. Gravity: 254%
  4. 42: 238%
  5. Monsters University: 233%
  6. The Hunger Games: Catching Fire: 226%
  7. Iron Man 3: 205%

Underperfomer (4 titles out of 69)

  1. White House Down: 49%
  2. After Earth: 47%
  3. The Lone Ranger: 42%
  4. Jack the Giant Slayer: 34%

No question, horror (especially when we include the horror spoof A Haunted House) had the best return for the studios’ investment dollars. The Purge knocks it out of the park, and every movie that was more than Double Golden was a horror movie (again, counting A Haunted House).

Mainstream comedies also do very well, though, including Jackass, We’re the Millers, Identity Thief, and The Heat…proving that while it isn’t necessary to have Melissa McCarthy top-billed, it’s a good idea. ūüėČ

Non-horror, non-animated geek movies don’t even make the Golden cut. ¬†On the other hand, three out of four of the underperformers were geek-friendly (and we could debate the fourth).

Does that high risk mean studios should stop making megabudgeted geek tentpoles?

Nope. ūüôā

There are a few reasons for that:

  • Even though Iron Man 3 wasn’t golden, it still dogroed hundreds of millions more for the studio than the production cost. That’s a lot of money! Profit matters, but having cash on hand counts, too
  • Lots of money on geek-friendly movies is made outside of the tickets for the initial theatre run. There are the merchandising bucks…how many licensed Halloween costumes from comedies are sold? Not that many, certainly compared to superhero movies
  • We have just been looking at domestic numbers so far…here’s where that international part comes into play. Comedies just don’t do as well internationally…humor is much harder to translate than explosions and special effects. ūüėČ Iron Man 3 made 66.3% of its box office outside the USA; The Heat made 30.6%. You’ll find similar numbers on other successful geek-friendly movies and mainstream comedies. As international box office becomes increasingly important, geek-friendly movies become more valuable

One other quick list: some geek-friendly movies which did not make the $40m dogro cut (and aren’t likely to do so):

  • The Mortal Instruments: City of Bones: dogro $31m, reported budget $60m. Even though we wouldn’t quite label it an underperformer, this is one of the ones that may scare studios away from young adult literature as source material. Not completely, of course, but it does make them a bit more cautious
  • Kick-*ss 2:¬†dogro $29m, reported budget $28m. It did barely make a profit…did we witness the power of Jim Carrey’s not supporting the movie? If so, is that better or worse for Carrey: would you be more reluctant to cast Carrey knowing that, if the actor later decides the movie has a moral issue, you could lose promotional support?
  • The World’s End: dogro $26m, reported budget $40m. Don’t worry too much about this one: it will be profitable when everything is taken into account, and even if it wasn’t, we still love Pegg and Frost
  • Carrie: dogro $35m, reported¬†budget $30m. It made a profit, but I think most people would have predicted more out of it
  • Machete Kills: dogro $7m, reported¬†budget $12m. It’s not about the money with this one…
  • Beautiful Creatures: dogro $19m, reported¬†budget $60m. A major underperformer…see Mortal Instruments above
  • About Time: dogro $15m, reported¬†budget unknown. Our guess is this one was still a success, but we don’t know for sure
  • R.I.P.D.: dogro $34m, reported budget $130m if this one could have clawed its way to $40m, it would have been one of our underperformers. This was not a good year for Ryan Reynolds, although¬†The Croods¬†did well. This movie and¬†Turbo, though? Not so much…we still love you, Ryan! Although, you know, maybe not like we love Pegg and Frost ūüėČ
  • Jobs:¬†dogro $16m, reported budget $12m. This one did okay
  • The Host: dogro $27m, reported budget $40m. We thought this one would do better: see Beautiful Creatures above
  • Scary Movie 5: dogro $32m, reported budget $20m. That’s good enough: expect a 6 at some point
  • Dark Skies: dogro $17m, reported budget $3.5m. Again, good enough

We’ll keep tracking 2013…and then on to 2014!

See you in the movies!

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle. To support this or other blogs/organizations, buy  Amazon Gift Cards from a link on the site, then use those to buy your items. There will be no cost to you, and a benefit to them.

Money, Golden, and Underperformers…our new box office labels

July 28, 2013

Money, Golden, and Underperformers…our new box office labels

We’ve recently added a new feature to our tracking of the movie box office.

Each year, we’ve keep track of the movie box office. You can see the 2013 information here:

2013 Movie Box Office: 40, 80, 1, 2 , 3

This year, we also added ranking them based on the amount of profit that they’ve made (comparing dogro…domestic gross to their reported production budgets). You can see that list here:

However, even knowing the dogro to production budget difference isn’t the whole story.

If a movie has a reported production budget of $100 million and dogros $120 million, it made the same amount of profit (just based on that calculation…ignoring the marketing budget and international grosses) as a movie that has a reported production budget of $40 million and dogros $60 million.

The latter, though, will be considered much more successful, in part because it was less risk for the studio.

One traditional measure of success is having a dogro of twice the production budget.

The Measured Circle is now labeling a movie that has a dogro of twice the production budget as “Money”.

A movie with three times the production budget gets a label from of us as “Golden”.

While we like to focus on the positive, it’s also worth noting movies that haven’t done as well as expected. If a movie’s dogro is less than half of its production budget, we are labeling them as an “Underperformer”.

These are the movies from this year (which have a dogro of at least $40 million) which have received labels from The Measured Circle so far. It’s possible that these labels may change as a movie makes more money domestically.

For more detail, see the links above.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle blog.

Movies so far this year 2013

May 12, 2013

Movies so far this year 2013

We’ve already entered the hot days of summer, as far as the box office is concerned. Iron Man 3 is blazing along, and we’ll see a series of movies which will dogro (domestic gross) over $100 million in the next couple of months (Star Trek Into Darkness next week, likely both Fast & Furious 6 and The Hangover Part III the following week, Man of Steel, Monsters University, White House Down, and so on).

Before we get blinded by those blockbusters, I wanted to take a look at how things have been going so far this year.

Where I have the information, I want to especially look at dogro versus the reported production budget. It’s important to note that movies make a lot of money outside the USA, and then there are a lot of expenses besides the production budget (marketing, for one). Movies also can make money on merchandising deals. However, I find it informative to look at the movies which have made the highest percentage of profit comparing dogro and the production budget.

Let’s say a movie costs $50 million to make, and dogros $100 million. That’s a $50 million profit in this calculation…but it’s also a 100% profit ($50m+$50m). For this one, we are going to say that a movie that costs $10m to make and dogros $60m is doing better than that $50m movie…it has 500% profit. I know you can’t spend your percentage of profit, but it’s a better return on investment. ūüôā

So, let’s take a look…I’m going to cut this off at the top 50 dogroing movies so far (after that, we get into a lot of art house fair). I also took out ones where I didn’t have budget data. Of course, some of these will make a lot more money yet (I’m looking at you, Tony Stark):

Title Studio Dogro Budget Profit %Profit
A Haunted House ORF $40,041,683  $       2,500,000 $37,541,683 1502%
Dark Skies W/Dim. $17,372,314  $       3,500,000 $13,872,314 396%
Mama Uni. $71,628,180  $    15,000,000 $56,628,180 378%
Jurassic Park 3D Uni. $44,118,910  $    10,000,000 $34,118,910 341%
The Call TriS $50,934,437  $    13,000,000 $37,934,437 292%
Identity Thief Uni. $133,522,005  $    35,000,000 $98,522,005 281%
Evil Dead (2013) TriS $53,465,508  $    17,000,000 $36,465,508 215%
The Last Exorcism Part II CBS $15,179,302  $       5,000,000 $10,179,302 204%
Spring Breakers A24 $14,019,724  $       5,000,000 $9,019,724 180%
Safe Haven Rela. $71,236,540  $    28,000,000 $43,236,540 154%
42 WB $81,192,000  $    40,000,000 $41,192,000 103%
21 and Over Rela. $25,663,612  $    13,000,000 $12,663,612 97%
Warm Bodies LG/S $66,380,662  $    35,000,000 $31,380,662 90%
Scary Movie 5 W/Dim. $29,938,030  $    20,000,000 $9,938,030 50%
Movie 43 Rela. $8,840,453  $       6,000,000 $2,840,453 47%
Pain and Gain Par. $37,932,000  $    26,000,000 $11,932,000 46%
Escape From Planet Earth Wein. $55,239,237  $    40,000,000 $15,239,237 38%
Olympus Has Fallen FD $95,877,624  $    70,000,000 $25,877,624 37%
Admission Focus $17,802,538  $    13,000,000 $4,802,538 37%
The Place Beyond the Pines Focus $19,303,536  $    15,000,000 $4,303,536 29%
The Croods Fox $170,315,000  $  135,000,000 $35,315,000 26%
Iron Man 3 BV $232,178,000  $  200,000,000 $32,178,000 16%
Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters Par. $55,703,475  $    50,000,000 $5,703,475 11%
Oz The Great and Powerful BV $229,182,320  $  215,000,000 $14,182,320 7%
G.I. Joe: Retaliation Par. $119,156,891  $  130,000,000 ($10,843,109) -8%
Gangster Squad WB $46,000,903  $    60,000,000 ($13,999,097) -23%
The Incredible Burt Wonderstone WB $22,537,881  $    30,000,000 ($7,462,119) -25%
A Good Day to Die Hard Fox $67,305,159  $    92,000,000 ($24,694,841) -27%
Oblivion Uni. $78,792,000  $  120,000,000 ($41,208,000) -34%
The Host (2013) ORF $26,209,584  $    40,000,000 ($13,790,416) -34%
Broken City Fox $19,701,164  $    35,000,000 ($15,298,836) -44%
Parker FD $17,616,641  $    35,000,000 ($17,383,359) -50%
The Big Wedding LGF $16,356,000  $    35,000,000 ($18,644,000) -53%
Jack the Giant Slayer WB (NL) $64,235,588  $  195,000,000 ($130,764,412) -67%
Beautiful Creatures (2013) WB $19,452,138  $    60,000,000 ($40,547,862) -68%
The Last Stand LGF $12,050,299  $    45,000,000 ($32,949,701) -73%

Looked at this way, the biggest success is…A Haunted House. That’s a low budget horror comedy, and the return was phenomenal.

Clearly, supernatural horror (comedy or not) was rewarded: A Haunted House; Dark Skies; Mama; Evil Dead; The Last Exorcism Part II…all highly profitable under this formula. Even Scary Movie 5, widely panned, has made more than a 50% profit.

Action movies with no horror/science fiction/fantasy element? Not so much. The Last Stand, Parker, Broken City, A Good Day to Die Hard…all in the negatives.

Okay, I’m sure a lot of people are more interested in the actual dollars than the percentages (especially those who aren’t actually investing. Here you go:

Title Studio Dogro Budget Profit
Identity Thief Uni. $133,522,005  $    35,000,000 $98,522,005
Mama Uni. $71,628,180  $    15,000,000 $56,628,180
Safe Haven Rela. $71,236,540  $    28,000,000 $43,236,540
42 WB $81,192,000  $    40,000,000 $41,192,000
The Call TriS $50,934,437  $    13,000,000 $37,934,437
A Haunted House ORF $40,041,683  $       2,500,000 $37,541,683
Evil Dead (2013) TriS $53,465,508  $    17,000,000 $36,465,508
The Croods Fox $170,315,000  $  135,000,000 $35,315,000
Jurassic Park 3D Uni. $44,118,910  $    10,000,000 $34,118,910
Iron Man 3 BV $232,178,000  $  200,000,000 $32,178,000
Warm Bodies LG/S $66,380,662  $    35,000,000 $31,380,662
Olympus Has Fallen FD $95,877,624  $    70,000,000 $25,877,624
Escape From Planet Earth Wein. $55,239,237  $    40,000,000 $15,239,237
Oz The Great and Powerful BV $229,182,320  $  215,000,000 $14,182,320
Dark Skies W/Dim. $17,372,314  $       3,500,000 $13,872,314
21 and Over Rela. $25,663,612  $    13,000,000 $12,663,612
Pain and Gain Par. $37,932,000  $    26,000,000 $11,932,000
The Last Exorcism Part II CBS $15,179,302  $       5,000,000 $10,179,302
Scary Movie 5 W/Dim. $29,938,030  $    20,000,000 $9,938,030
Spring Breakers A24 $14,019,724  $       5,000,000 $9,019,724
Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters Par. $55,703,475  $    50,000,000 $5,703,475
Admission Focus $17,802,538  $    13,000,000 $4,802,538
The Place Beyond the Pines Focus $19,303,536  $    15,000,000 $4,303,536
Movie 43 Rela. $8,840,453  $       6,000,000 $2,840,453
The Incredible Burt Wonderstone WB $22,537,881  $    30,000,000 ($7,462,119)
G.I. Joe: Retaliation Par. $119,156,891  $  130,000,000 ($10,843,109)
The Host (2013) ORF $26,209,584  $    40,000,000 ($13,790,416)
Gangster Squad WB $46,000,903  $    60,000,000 ($13,999,097)
Broken City Fox $19,701,164  $    35,000,000 ($15,298,836)
Parker FD $17,616,641  $    35,000,000 ($17,383,359)
The Big Wedding LGF $16,356,000  $    35,000,000 ($18,644,000)
A Good Day to Die Hard Fox $67,305,159  $    92,000,000 ($24,694,841)
The Last Stand LGF $12,050,299  $    45,000,000 ($32,949,701)
Beautiful Creatures (2013) WB $19,452,138  $    60,000,000 ($40,547,862)
Oblivion Uni. $78,792,000  $  120,000,000 ($41,208,000)
Jack the Giant Slayer WB (NL) $64,235,588  $  195,000,000 ($130,764,412)

People were so down on John Carter last year. It’s budget was about $250m, and it dogroed about $73m. Where would that put it on this list? Oh, yeah…still at the bottom with -$177m. Hm…makes it harder to hold out hope for a sequel. ūüėČ

Next, let’s take a look at studios. This time, we’ll do their total profits (just in the group of movies above):

Studio Profit
Uni. Total $148,061,095
TriS Total $74,399,945
Rela. Total $58,740,605
BV Total $46,360,320
LG/S Total $31,380,662
W/Dim. Total $23,810,344
ORF Total $23,751,267
Wein. Total $15,239,237
CBS Total $10,179,302
Focus Total $9,106,074
A24 Total $9,019,724
FD Total $8,494,265
Par. Total $6,792,366
Fox Total ($4,678,677)
WB Total ($20,817,078)
LGF Total ($51,593,701)
WB (NL) Total ($130,764,412)
Grand Total $257,481,338

If you were a Warner Brothers exec, you wouldn’t want to bump into the Universal guys at lunch, right?

Lastly, as we did last year, let’s look at budget versus profit:


As we saw last year, it’s really hard to make a profit with a big budget. Some of that will happen: Iron Man 3 will do it. So far this year, if you get over about $40m, it’s a losing proposition…

To track the movie box office throughout the year, see

2013 Movie Box Office: 40, 80, 1, 2 , 3

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

%d bloggers like this: