My take on…Star Trek into Darkness

May 19, 2013

My take on…Star Trek into Darkness

This one is easy…it’s the best movie I’ve seen so far this year, and my Significant Other a bit more than tolerated it, so that’s a win. ;)

It was exciting, fun, and moving. Special effects brought us a real sense of “Cool! I want to do that!” There were sly allusions to the original Star Trek series and movies (which probably gave me a better experience than my SO), but these actors and characters are also establishing their own territory.

My SO particularly noted Zachary Quinto’s strength as Spock, although it is quite a different Spock from Leonard Nimoy’s. I like Chris Pine’s Captain Kirk. Interestingly, my SO thought Karl Urban looked too much like DeForest Kelly…I didn’t have a problem with that.

The movie is a thrill ride, but one with a significant amount of effective humor. Simon Pegg’s Scotty is really there for comic relief at this point, but that works reasonably well.

Does it all work?

For me, the meta stuff can be a bit much. I understand how the alternate timeline from the first J.J. Abrams movie allows for some parallel, but skewed events. Although it wasn’t a big problem, it did seem a bit…contrived.

The other thing I’d say is that the great plot twists weren’t that hard to anticipate. That might be a strength, though, making this plot more linear than the first movie.

I’m careful about avoiding spoilers, so at this point, I won’t say much about the plot of the movie. If you do want that sort of  detail, here is the

Memory Alpha article

Bottom line…go see it, it’s fun. :)

By the way, if you haven’t seen this

Audi commercial

with Quinto and Nimoy, it’s worth a look…

To track the movie box office for the rest of the year see 2013 Movie Box Office: 40, 80, 1, 2 , 3.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

The fundamental difference between Star Trek and Star Wars

May 16, 2013

The fundamental difference between Star Trek and Star Wars

Star Trek Into Darkness is opening tomorrow in the USA, which will mean midnight shows tonight.

There has been quite a bit of talk about Star Trek versus Star Wars recently, especially now that J.J. Abrams is guiding both franchises.

Certainly, there are some similarities; however, there is one key difference that we hope the director keeps in mind.

The world is good (Star Trek).

The world is bad (Star Wars).

That’s what sets them apart philosophically. A fan can certainly like both…we might feel like we are struggling against evil on one day (or imagining it could happen) and fighting for good on another. The original series of Star Trek and the original trilogy of Star Wars make this a stark difference.

Who are the good guys in Star Trek?

The Federation. They are the establishment, the superpower…they have the dominant technology and the lion’s share of the resources.

Who are the bad guys in Star Wars?

The Empire. They are the establishment, the superpower…they have the dominant technology and the lion’s share of the resources.

Certainly, Star Trek’s Captain Kirk doesn’t always agree with the methodology of the Federation. Kirk doesn’t like the  bureaucracy which can slow things down. However, Captain Kirk does agree with the goals of the Federation…just not always on how to best achieve them.

On the other hand, Star Wars’ Luke Skywalker absolutely disagrees with the Empire, and wants to see them defeated and out of power.

As a fan, when you empathize with the two, that’s the dichotomy. In Star Trek, society is good and has lofty goals. The Enterprise crew fights for good. In Star Wars, society at the top is evil and has reprehensible schemes…the rebels fight against evil.

For good.

Against evil.

It’s pretty simple.

We can see this in a lot of ways. One of the obvious ones is the iconic weaponry. Star Trek has a phaser which can (and often is, especially in unknown situations) set on stun. It is designed to be used for non-lethal tactics.

The closest you can get to being non-lethal with a light saber from Star Wars is to just dismember someone.

If you think humans (and other intelligent beings) are likely to be good, you want your default setting to be stun. If you think they are likely to be bad, a light saber is more geared towards removing the threat.

What does Star Wars’ Empire do it when it discovers people who think differently and might oppose it? Build a Death Star and blow up the planet.

What does Star Trek’s Federation do when it discovers people who think differently and might oppose it? They leave them alone. The Prime Directive requires that societies be able to develop on their own (if they don’t know about a certain technology, Federation personnel can’t give it to them or tell them about it, even if it makes their lives better…that would change them and eliminate what might have happened). By definition, the Federation does not say that it is better than every other society…and it sees that more good is likely to happen than evil if people are able to choose their own paths.

There is the guiding principle, Mr. Abrams: fight against versus fight for.

Keep that in mind and we can love both of your visions for the two beloved universes.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle blog.

Man in Black talks about…UFO sighting?

May 14, 2013

Man in Black talks about…UFO sighting?

Okay, this was one of the weirdest stories I’ve read lately!

According to this

Huffington Post article

Lt. Col. Richard French recently spoke at the

Citizen Hearing on Disclosure

about having seen two aliens working on a UFO underwater.

That’s not the weird part, though…no, really.

The HuffPo identified French as “…a lead investigator of Project Blue Book in the 1950s”.

Some of you are now saying, “That’s the weird part, right? Wasn’t that the debunking group of the Air Force? How ironic!”

No, we’re still not to the really weird part.

The name was familiar to me, and I knew the names of the big players in Project Blue Book.

“Richard French” was the name given by one of the most infamous Men in Black in ufological literaure!

Before the graphic novel which inspired the Will Smith movie, the general idea was that the “Men in Black” might have actually been aliens, discouraging investigation into UFOs by pretending to be government agents. I’ve written about the history of the Men in Black before.

I mentioned in passing a MIB who tried to drink Jell-O…that was Richard French!

You can read a bit of that story here:

UFO evidence excerpt

It’s taken from John A. Keel, who loved the high strangeness stories like this. It’s reported in UFOs: Operation Trojan Horse (AKA Why UFOS).

So, this is bizarre!

If the 1967 Jell-O virgin was an alien, did that alien just speak out about seeing other (very different looking) aliens? If so, why? Would it still be part of an alien plan to discredit UFOs or discourage reporting?

Another possibility is that in 1967, the alien just “borrowed” the name of this Richard French. Keel says, “There proved to be a Richard French in the Air Force in Minnesota, but he did not even remotely answer to the above description. In that case, the one who just recently told the story might be the real Richard French.

That description, by the way? Again, from Keel:

“He was about five feet nine inches tall with a kind of olive complexion and pointed face. His hair was dark and very long…” (page 172 of the Manor Books edition).

Is that the person who spoke May 3rd? Well, honestly, it’s hard to tell in the video at the HuffPo article…remember, the Jell-O thing was more than forty years ago.

Here’s another possibility: Richard French was having a laugh at the expense of the UFO witness in 1967, pretending to be an alien.

One could also argue that Keel wasn’t accurate…but why use the name Richard French?

Perhaps the name is a coincidence…but the Richard French who recently spoke should have been investigating UFO sightings, which is what the 1967 Richard French did.

Let’s see…I’m just trying to cover the possibilities. Could the person who spoke have chosen that name, knowing it was the name of a famous Man in Black? I would guess the background would have been checked by the people presenting the speakers. I tried to open the document at the website with the testimony (figuring it might have a bio), but Word didn’t like it…and warned me not to open it if I didn’t trust it…

I have to say, I find it a bit odd that other people don’t seem to have made this connection, even people who are very knowledgeable of the UFO literature.

Thought you’d want to know…

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle blog.

Movies so far this year 2013

May 12, 2013

Movies so far this year 2013

We’ve already entered the hot days of summer, as far as the box office is concerned. Iron Man 3 is blazing along, and we’ll see a series of movies which will dogro (domestic gross) over $100 million in the next couple of months (Star Trek Into Darkness next week, likely both Fast & Furious 6 and The Hangover Part III the following week, Man of Steel, Monsters University, White House Down, and so on).

Before we get blinded by those blockbusters, I wanted to take a look at how things have been going so far this year.

Where I have the information, I want to especially look at dogro versus the reported production budget. It’s important to note that movies make a lot of money outside the USA, and then there are a lot of expenses besides the production budget (marketing, for one). Movies also can make money on merchandising deals. However, I find it informative to look at the movies which have made the highest percentage of profit comparing dogro and the production budget.

Let’s say a movie costs $50 million to make, and dogros $100 million. That’s a $50 million profit in this calculation…but it’s also a 100% profit ($50m+$50m). For this one, we are going to say that a movie that costs $10m to make and dogros $60m is doing better than that $50m movie…it has 500% profit. I know you can’t spend your percentage of profit, but it’s a better return on investment. :)

So, let’s take a look…I’m going to cut this off at the top 50 dogroing movies so far (after that, we get into a lot of art house fair). I also took out ones where I didn’t have budget data. Of course, some of these will make a lot more money yet (I’m looking at you, Tony Stark):

Title Studio Dogro Budget Profit %Profit
A Haunted House ORF $40,041,683  $       2,500,000 $37,541,683 1502%
Dark Skies W/Dim. $17,372,314  $       3,500,000 $13,872,314 396%
Mama Uni. $71,628,180  $    15,000,000 $56,628,180 378%
Jurassic Park 3D Uni. $44,118,910  $    10,000,000 $34,118,910 341%
The Call TriS $50,934,437  $    13,000,000 $37,934,437 292%
Identity Thief Uni. $133,522,005  $    35,000,000 $98,522,005 281%
Evil Dead (2013) TriS $53,465,508  $    17,000,000 $36,465,508 215%
The Last Exorcism Part II CBS $15,179,302  $       5,000,000 $10,179,302 204%
Spring Breakers A24 $14,019,724  $       5,000,000 $9,019,724 180%
Safe Haven Rela. $71,236,540  $    28,000,000 $43,236,540 154%
42 WB $81,192,000  $    40,000,000 $41,192,000 103%
21 and Over Rela. $25,663,612  $    13,000,000 $12,663,612 97%
Warm Bodies LG/S $66,380,662  $    35,000,000 $31,380,662 90%
Scary Movie 5 W/Dim. $29,938,030  $    20,000,000 $9,938,030 50%
Movie 43 Rela. $8,840,453  $       6,000,000 $2,840,453 47%
Pain and Gain Par. $37,932,000  $    26,000,000 $11,932,000 46%
Escape From Planet Earth Wein. $55,239,237  $    40,000,000 $15,239,237 38%
Olympus Has Fallen FD $95,877,624  $    70,000,000 $25,877,624 37%
Admission Focus $17,802,538  $    13,000,000 $4,802,538 37%
The Place Beyond the Pines Focus $19,303,536  $    15,000,000 $4,303,536 29%
The Croods Fox $170,315,000  $  135,000,000 $35,315,000 26%
Iron Man 3 BV $232,178,000  $  200,000,000 $32,178,000 16%
Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters Par. $55,703,475  $    50,000,000 $5,703,475 11%
Oz The Great and Powerful BV $229,182,320  $  215,000,000 $14,182,320 7%
G.I. Joe: Retaliation Par. $119,156,891  $  130,000,000 ($10,843,109) -8%
Gangster Squad WB $46,000,903  $    60,000,000 ($13,999,097) -23%
The Incredible Burt Wonderstone WB $22,537,881  $    30,000,000 ($7,462,119) -25%
A Good Day to Die Hard Fox $67,305,159  $    92,000,000 ($24,694,841) -27%
Oblivion Uni. $78,792,000  $  120,000,000 ($41,208,000) -34%
The Host (2013) ORF $26,209,584  $    40,000,000 ($13,790,416) -34%
Broken City Fox $19,701,164  $    35,000,000 ($15,298,836) -44%
Parker FD $17,616,641  $    35,000,000 ($17,383,359) -50%
The Big Wedding LGF $16,356,000  $    35,000,000 ($18,644,000) -53%
Jack the Giant Slayer WB (NL) $64,235,588  $  195,000,000 ($130,764,412) -67%
Beautiful Creatures (2013) WB $19,452,138  $    60,000,000 ($40,547,862) -68%
The Last Stand LGF $12,050,299  $    45,000,000 ($32,949,701) -73%

Looked at this way, the biggest success is…A Haunted House. That’s a low budget horror comedy, and the return was phenomenal.

Clearly, supernatural horror (comedy or not) was rewarded: A Haunted House; Dark Skies; Mama; Evil Dead; The Last Exorcism Part II…all highly profitable under this formula. Even Scary Movie 5, widely panned, has made more than a 50% profit.

Action movies with no horror/science fiction/fantasy element? Not so much. The Last Stand, Parker, Broken City, A Good Day to Die Hard…all in the negatives.

Okay, I’m sure a lot of people are more interested in the actual dollars than the percentages (especially those who aren’t actually investing. Here you go:

Title Studio Dogro Budget Profit
Identity Thief Uni. $133,522,005  $    35,000,000 $98,522,005
Mama Uni. $71,628,180  $    15,000,000 $56,628,180
Safe Haven Rela. $71,236,540  $    28,000,000 $43,236,540
42 WB $81,192,000  $    40,000,000 $41,192,000
The Call TriS $50,934,437  $    13,000,000 $37,934,437
A Haunted House ORF $40,041,683  $       2,500,000 $37,541,683
Evil Dead (2013) TriS $53,465,508  $    17,000,000 $36,465,508
The Croods Fox $170,315,000  $  135,000,000 $35,315,000
Jurassic Park 3D Uni. $44,118,910  $    10,000,000 $34,118,910
Iron Man 3 BV $232,178,000  $  200,000,000 $32,178,000
Warm Bodies LG/S $66,380,662  $    35,000,000 $31,380,662
Olympus Has Fallen FD $95,877,624  $    70,000,000 $25,877,624
Escape From Planet Earth Wein. $55,239,237  $    40,000,000 $15,239,237
Oz The Great and Powerful BV $229,182,320  $  215,000,000 $14,182,320
Dark Skies W/Dim. $17,372,314  $       3,500,000 $13,872,314
21 and Over Rela. $25,663,612  $    13,000,000 $12,663,612
Pain and Gain Par. $37,932,000  $    26,000,000 $11,932,000
The Last Exorcism Part II CBS $15,179,302  $       5,000,000 $10,179,302
Scary Movie 5 W/Dim. $29,938,030  $    20,000,000 $9,938,030
Spring Breakers A24 $14,019,724  $       5,000,000 $9,019,724
Hansel and Gretel: Witch Hunters Par. $55,703,475  $    50,000,000 $5,703,475
Admission Focus $17,802,538  $    13,000,000 $4,802,538
The Place Beyond the Pines Focus $19,303,536  $    15,000,000 $4,303,536
Movie 43 Rela. $8,840,453  $       6,000,000 $2,840,453
The Incredible Burt Wonderstone WB $22,537,881  $    30,000,000 ($7,462,119)
G.I. Joe: Retaliation Par. $119,156,891  $  130,000,000 ($10,843,109)
The Host (2013) ORF $26,209,584  $    40,000,000 ($13,790,416)
Gangster Squad WB $46,000,903  $    60,000,000 ($13,999,097)
Broken City Fox $19,701,164  $    35,000,000 ($15,298,836)
Parker FD $17,616,641  $    35,000,000 ($17,383,359)
The Big Wedding LGF $16,356,000  $    35,000,000 ($18,644,000)
A Good Day to Die Hard Fox $67,305,159  $    92,000,000 ($24,694,841)
The Last Stand LGF $12,050,299  $    45,000,000 ($32,949,701)
Beautiful Creatures (2013) WB $19,452,138  $    60,000,000 ($40,547,862)
Oblivion Uni. $78,792,000  $  120,000,000 ($41,208,000)
Jack the Giant Slayer WB (NL) $64,235,588  $  195,000,000 ($130,764,412)

People were so down on John Carter last year. It’s budget was about $250m, and it dogroed about $73m. Where would that put it on this list? Oh, yeah…still at the bottom with -$177m. Hm…makes it harder to hold out hope for a sequel. ;)

Next, let’s take a look at studios. This time, we’ll do their total profits (just in the group of movies above):

Studio Profit
Uni. Total $148,061,095
TriS Total $74,399,945
Rela. Total $58,740,605
BV Total $46,360,320
LG/S Total $31,380,662
W/Dim. Total $23,810,344
ORF Total $23,751,267
Wein. Total $15,239,237
CBS Total $10,179,302
Focus Total $9,106,074
A24 Total $9,019,724
FD Total $8,494,265
Par. Total $6,792,366
Fox Total ($4,678,677)
WB Total ($20,817,078)
LGF Total ($51,593,701)
WB (NL) Total ($130,764,412)
Grand Total $257,481,338

If you were a Warner Brothers exec, you wouldn’t want to bump into the Universal guys at lunch, right?

Lastly, as we did last year, let’s look at budget versus profit:

Profit20130511

As we saw last year, it’s really hard to make a profit with a big budget. Some of that will happen: Iron Man 3 will do it. So far this year, if you get over about $40m, it’s a losing proposition…

To track the movie box office throughout the year, see

2013 Movie Box Office: 40, 80, 1, 2 , 3

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

Ray Harryhausen reported dead

May 8, 2013

Ray Harryhausen reported dead

We casually say about people that they “make movies” (when their contributions may be quite small), but it can be said accurately and enthusiastically about Ray Harryhausen.

Ray produced, wrote, directed, and was the cinematographer on movies.

More importantly than that, Ray actually made the characters.

Sculpted them.

Made them move.

Made us thrill to them!

Made us want to make characters like that ourselves.

Ray Harryhausen is first and foremost associated with his ground-breaking and immortal stop motion animation.

Create a character.

Take a frame of film.

Move it a tiny bit.

Take another frame.

Make it live, make it threaten, make it sad…give it emotions.

Have it interact with flesh and blood actors.

Give us things that couldn’t exist…change the concept of a cyclops from just a big one-eyed human giant to a monster with a horn.

Set the pattern for so many videogames with a horde of skeleton warriors relentlessly attacking Jason and the Argonauts!

For a geek like me, I can’t say enough about Ray Harryhausen. Fortunately, I won’t have to…his name will live on and people will be writing about his contributions a hundred years from now.

Here are some of those movies which will still amaze children in the future, regardless of how the technology may change:

  • It Came from Beneath the Sea’
  • 20 Million Miles to Earth
  • The 7th Voyage of Sinbad
  • The 3 Worlds of Gulliver
  • Mysterious Island
  • Jason and the Argonauts
  • First Men in the Moon
  • One Million Years B.C.
  • The Valley of Gwangi
  • The Golden Voyage of Sinbad
  • Sinbad and the Eye of the Tiger
  • Clash of the Titans

Pixar paid homage to Ray Harryhausen with an establishment named for the SFX master…you can see it prominently in the ride at Disney’s California Adventure.

Ray also voiced a polar bear in Elf, and had a cameo in the remake of Mighty Joe Young (he had worked on the original).

Good-bye, Ray Harryhausen…the world is less special without you.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

My take on…Iron Man 3

May 6, 2013

My take on…Iron Man 3

Look, you’re probably going to see it.

Iron Man 3 had a huge opening weekend, and is on its way to rapidly pass Oz the Great and Powerful to become the biggest dogroing (domestic grossing) movie of the year…so far (there are some big contenders coming).

Don’t worry, I’m not going to say you shouldn’t see it. :) Ben Kingsley is great in the movie, and Robert Downey is entertaining. There is a lot of spectacle to it, and some excellent effects.

However…

There might have been too much spectacle…too much happening.

I usually don’t go into a

SPOILER ALERT

this early, and I”m really quite careful about it, but I do want to mention some things. These are really on the order of minor spoilers…pretty much what you would know if you watched the trailers or read articles about the movie. I just like to give fair warning. I love to be surprised by my entertainment, and I don’t want to take that away from anybody else.

The main problem I had with the script is that there are so many Iron Man suits! Some of the suits are empty, but still move around…robot suits. Several of the characters wear Iron Man suits at some point. It became like an episode of the “Suprah Winfrey Show”: “You get a suit! And you get a suit! And you get a suit!;) It was hard being very emotionally invested when Iron Man was in a  fight when we couldn’t identify Iron Man with Tony Stark. I mean, the way things are going, it seemed like an “Iron Dog” suit was going to be inevitable.

In fact, it was very telling that a shot at the end of the movie said that “Tony Stark will return”…not that Iron Man would. We are clearly supposed to think of them as two different things. I would guess that The Avengers 2, scheduled for May 1, 2015, will be the last time we see Robert Downey, Jr. play Tony Stark. It will then be time to reboot the role. That’s not because Downey will have turned 50 less than a month before that. It’s more that they will have done what they can with this version of Tony Stark…a clean slate will be easier when you write new heroic tales.

Another thing is that there appeared to be large logical flaws, although in a comic book world, you can often explain them in some creative way offscreen. People who could regenerate could fall into fire….and then be seen with their hair and clothes effectively intact. Okay, yes, it might be possible for your hair to grow back super-quickly…but into the same hairstyle and length? If the hair grows two months’ worth in seconds, does the person age that much as well? What about the clothes? Those obviously aren’t growing back…

Now, of course, I could just ignore logic, but that’s not how superheroes usually work. They have rules, and work within the real world. Even though those rules might not fit with our understanding of physics, you don’t just dispense with physics (especially for other characters).

For example, have you ever wondered how Superman shaves? Obviously, his hair is invulnerable, or it wouldn’t still be on his head with some of the super-speed things he does. No ordinary blade could cut it.

I remember reading a comic book where Superman bounced his own heat vision off a reflective surface to shave, but that didn’t make sense to me. When Kryptonians on Earth fight and hit each other with heat vision, they don’t cut the other person in half.

However, the fact that they tried to explain it in some reasonable way is my point.

This script didn’t seem to bother.

Then, there was this kid, Harley Keener (Ty Simpkins). Yes, you can have a child in a movie like this and make it work, but I have to admit…I was reminded too much (based on attitude) of Brandon De Wilde’s Oscar-nominated performance in Shane. I kept expecting Harley to say, “Come back, Shane!” and have Tony Stark say, “Is that some sort of Black humor?” See, Shane Black co-wrote the script, and directed Iron Man 3, and it would be an in-joke and…never mind. ;)

Seriously, though, the role felt like it was there to make the movie more accessible to kids…the same accusation that we hear about a lot of earlier comic sidekicks.

END SPOILER

Overall, though, I’d say go ahead and see it. There are some great action sequences, and when is it not worth seeing Robert Downey, Jr.? (Answer: never). It’s not a bad movie…it just makes me intrigued to see what they do with Iron Man in the movies in the future.

To track the movie box office for the rest of the year see 2013 Movie Box Office: 40, 80, 1, 2 , 3.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

Saturday is Free Comic Book Day!

May 4, 2013

Saturday is Free Comic Book Day!

Sure, tomorrow is Star Wars Day…that’s true every May Fourth. It comes from, “May the Fourth be with you…” There will be some deals in connection with it:

NBC news article
Star Wars store at Amazon (deals this weekend more than 50% off)

However, you can get an even better deal because it’s the first Saturday in May…it’s Free Comic Book Day!

On FCBD, you can go into participating comic book shops and pick up special editions comics for free. You can see the list of them

here

Since part of the point of it is to promote local shops, I don’t think they are doing digital comics yet, but perhaps some day.

These comics are intended to get people into reading comics, and so are more accessible than some series. Ask your clerk for help with something kid friendly, if you like.

Enjoy!

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle blog.

A trip to Disneyland 2013

April 30, 2013

A trip to Disneyland 2013

My Significant Other and I just got back from a trip to Disneyland, where we celebrated a 25th anniversary.

I thought I’d give you some impressions of it.

I’m a Disney fan from way back, and have been there many times…including with my SO before.

I continue to be amazed (every time) at how good their Customer Service is.

We did have a problem before we even got to the park. We had booked a hotel through Disney travel, and when we got the confirmation, I didn’t realize it was for another hotel.

When we got down there (we drove for about 6 1/2 hours), and walked to the hotel, we realized it was the wrong one.

That was an issue, because we have special dietary needs, so we bring our own food…we really need a kitchen.

I called Disney Travel, and they got us into another hotel with a kitchen smoothly and efficiently. It was a bit funny when they offered us a food credit in the park (after I’d explained the food issue)…so instead, they just waived the change fee (making an exception for us).

One really cool thing they did was give us buttons to wear that said it was our anniversary. What was nice was that so many of the park cast members (employees) would yell, “Happy anniversary!” as we walked past…even people selling popcorn and such. That sounds hokey, but it really did make us feel special. They also have buttons if it’s your birthday…if you go, check in at Town Hall about getting them.

We got in on an Early Morning, and Tomorrowland and Fantasyland were open.

We went on Star Tours…wow, has that changed! I missed the Paul Reubens (Pee-wee Herman) voiced robot, but it was fun. My SO (like some other people on simulators) has had problems with the ride before, but didn’t have that same effect this time.

We rode the Matterhorn, which we enjoy…it got me wondering as to how many people now think of that as the “Abominable Snowman” ride…I heard a lot of people mentioning that, which is a relatively new addition.

We were able to pretty much walk onto Indiana Jones after the rest of the park opened: that’s our favorite ride! It’s interesting that some of the best rides are not based on strictly Disney characters, but of course, they were also added later.

We continued around to Pirates, which now prominently features Captain Jack Sparrow…even the dialog in the siege scene has changed to relate to the Captain.

There were also some projection effects that were new.

Next up: The Haunted Mansion. While we were on it, there was a delay (that happens), and a new voice was instructing us what to do with our “Doom Buggies”. There were some other changes (fewer “jump scares”), but it was certainly nostalgic to hear the legendary Paul Frees doing the regular narration.

One thing that has improved: more healthy food options. We bought Vegetarian Disneyland – How To Find Great Vegetarian Food at Disneyland before we went, and that did help us find some  tofu. :) We still ate most of our food in the hotel room, but it was good to be able to get something in the middle of the day.

We went to Cars Land: that one was all new to us. It’s actually in Disney California Adventure (DCA to fans).

I had deliberately not read up on the new rides before we went (I like to be surprised), and there was one there that was quite a surprise. It was Luigi’s Flying Tires, and it was very much like the old Flying Saucers ride at Disneyland (although considerably improved).

What happens is that the ride is like a giant air hockey table. You get in a tire (in the old ride, it was a flying saucer), and then airjets blow up out of the ground, making you hover. You can make the tire move in different directions by leaning (two of you are in one tire, typically, so you have to work together). It is also like (gentle) bumper cars…you can careen into other people.

I had read a great article years back about the physics of why the flying saucer ride kept failing: apparently, when visitors bounced up and down at a certain rate, it caused the jets to shut off…and it took some time to power them up again. No problem like that here. We would definitely do that one again…and I think you’d improve over time.

Another major ride there was Radiator Springs Racers. This one was clearly a next generation ride, with a lot of sophistication to it. It’s a bit like Splash Mountain, in the sense that there is a “dark ride” section (where you pass by scenes while you are inside a building), and then a thrill ride part. The movement was a lot of fun: it was not only fast, it was smooth. The cars were like slot cars…you weren’t riding on a track with two rails, but there was a track directly in the middle.

The line was very cleverly designed, weaving you in and out of shelters, and even having the equivalent of rock climbing walls (the “rocks” were bottles in cement) to entertain the kids. That was a good thing, though…I’m sure we were in line for over an hour. When we got out, the “stand by” wait time (that’s for regular riders, not people using Fastpass) was listed as 90 (!) minutes.

It was a great ride, and benefited from a newer technology they are using to make the audi0-animatronic type figures more realistic…using screens to project their eyes (that’s the same thing that they do with the Mr. Potato Head barker outside the Toy Story shooting gallery ride…which is also a lot of fun).

The other new ride we did was Monsters, Inc. Mike & Sulley to the Rescue! in Hollywood Land in DCA. It was a more traditional dark ride…slow moving vehicle going past scenes. It was nice.

The one other big new thing for us was the World of Color. This was a spectacular show, with colored fountains. They projected images onto the water, which was very effective. They used fire jets, and they were hot! I uncomfortably felt the heat from probably fifty yards away.

That was one of the few things where they really need to make some improvements, though. We had a Fastpass for it, but still had to wait on an uncomfortable hard surface for about an hour. It was clear that many people were uncomfortable sitting there, and we were quite crowded. Then, we had to stand up for the show for an hour…still on that hard surface. If you were short, it was definitely hard to see a lot of the show…that was a problem for some kids and shorter adults. I’m sure they’ll figure something out for that eventually…even if they had railings come up out of the floor so you could lean it would be a lot better.

Overall, for us, it was still The Magic Kingdom…the Happiest Place on Earth. :)

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

Bufo in Oz: was Dorothy’s house used as a weapon?

April 23, 2013

Bufo in Oz: was Dorothy’s house used as a weapon?

I’ve been a big fan of Oz for a very long time. In this series, Bufo in Oz, I’m going to address specific topics about L. Frank Baum’s Oz.

SPOILER ALERT: This post talk about specific things that happen in the Wizard of Oz series by L. Frank Baum. If you have not read them yet, and would like the joy of discovery, I would skip this post.

While the books can be downloaded individually for free at places like Project Gutenberg, this collection

The Complete Wizard of Oz Collection

has all fourteen of the original books for ninety-nine cents at the time of writing. 

Was Dorothy’s house used as a weapon?

There had been equilibrium in Oz for many years.

After four “wicked” witches had split the country evenly (following one of them, Mombi, abducting the king), two of them were overthrown by “good” witches.

When Oscar Diggs arrived in a balloon, he was believed to be very powerful (flight was, and would remain, unusual in Oz). He was able to have a city built, and ostensibly ruled the whole land.

However, he had been chased out of the West by use of the flying monkeys, and never ventured outside the Emerald City (or even outside of his own living quarters).

It’s safe to assume that the real balance was between the two pairs of aligned witches: Glinda in the South (she is called the Good Witch of the North in the 1939 Judy Garland version, but that was a change) and the Good Witch of the North (who is unnamed) on one side, and the Wicked Witches of the East and West on the other.

Mombi had been part of the Wicked Witches’ alliance, but had been overthrown herself by the Good Witch of the North. She was still around, but being a witch was forbidden, and her power was considerably diminished.

It’s not entirely clear what happened to the Wicked Witch who had ruled the South, except that Glinda had “conquered” her. Glinda later threatens to kill Mombi, although she says it is an idle threat…but Glinda also maintains an army. The fate of the Wicked Witch of the South may not have been as merciful as that of Mombi.

That is where the balance was.

Then, an extraordinary event occurred.

A farmhouse from the Outside World (containing Dorothy Gale, an orphan living with her aunt and uncle, and Toto, a dog) was picked up by a cyclone, blown to Oz, and dropped on the Wicked Witch of the East, killing her…and changing the status quo in a way that led to the defeat of the Wicked Witch of the West and a change in the central authority.

That seems like an amazing coincidence: of all the places in Oz, the house happens to fall on one of the most powerful magic users and important people?

What if it wasn’t a coincidence?

Is it possible that Dorothy’s house was used as a deliberate weapon…that someone used magic to direct its path?

There are some indicators that that’s what happened.

First, who would do it?

Clearly, Glinda, and her ally, the Good Witch of the North, stood to benefit. Rather than two versus two, the “witch war” would become two against one…much better odds.

The Good Witch alliance might also have the power to do it…they are, after all, magic users. Diggs himself later says, “…it is quite beyond my powers to make a cyclone…” Is the Wizard saying it is beyond everyone’s powers, or just his? Does he know that the Witches can do it? Should he have said, “No one can make a cyclone”…or is he being specific about himself?

In fact, L. Frank Baum makes a point about how the house is first lifted by the cyclone:

“From the far north they heard a low wail of the wind, and Uncle Henry and Dorothy could see where the long grass bowed in waves before the coming storm. There now came a sharp whistling in the air from the south, and as they turned their eyes that way they saw ripples in the grass coming from that direction also.”

Notice that the winds came from the north and the south? Those are the parts of the Land of Oz that were under the control of the Good Witches alliance. Could that have been, at the least, symbolic?

I asked Dr. Scott Calvin, a physics professor at Sarah Lawrence College, if what Baum had described was likely without magical intervention:

The Measured Circle: ”Does the wind coming from the North and the South make meteorological sense? Does it not make any difference (winds can come from any direction before a cyclone?) or would this be anomalous?”

Professor Calvin: “It’s anomalous. For a typical Kansas (or Dakota, for that matter) tornado, the winds would be from the south. Around the thunderstorm systems that form tornadoes, there could be a lot of variations, but I really don’t understand the kind of converging winds that Baum describes.”

Of course, L. Frank Baum, the “Royal Historian”, could simply have been wrong…but why make up those particular details? Cardinal directions are important in the Oz books, and certainly may matter here.

The house does not break apart and Dorothy and Toto have no trouble surviving the journey (which lasts hours…and crosses the Deadly Deserts surrounding Oz). In fact, we are told

“The cyclone had set the house down very gently–for a cyclone–”

This could suggest a controlled descent…that could have been done to protect Dorothy and Toto, although it could conceivably have been due to a defensive action by the Wicked Witch of the East (who might have slowed the descent without being able to stop it). The Royal Historian says that Dorothy would have been hurt by the jarring landing if she didn’t happen to be on the bed, suggesting that the latter may be more likely.

Suspiciously, the Good Witch of the North is on the scene almost immediately after the house lands.

The witch explains it this way:

“When they saw the Witch of the East was dead the Munchkins sent a swift messenger to me, and I came at once. I am the Witch of the North.”

That would have to have been a very swift messenger indeed. Dorothy is awakened by the shock of the landing, springs from the bed, and runs outside. She is looking at the sights, but there is no suggestion that any real time passes before a group of people, including the Good Witch of the North, come up to her.

People typically travel by foot in Oz (although there are some other methods described in the books). It doesn’t seem likely that there is any swift mass transport, or telecommunication to get the information about the house which has just landed to the Good Witch of the North, and give her time to get there.

It seems much more likely that she was already nearby when her enemy was killed. Did she know where the house was going to land? Was she in some way distracting the Wicked Witch, or even keeping her in the right spot?

The Good Witch doesn’t seem particularly surprised about the death of the Wicked Witch. She even laughs when the woman dissolves.

Then, there is one of the most interesting events in Oz.

While the group tries to assess the situation, the Good Witch does something specific:

“As for the little old woman, she took off her cap and balanced the point on the end of her nose, while she counted “One, two, three” in a solemn voice. At once the cap changed to a slate, on which was written in big, white chalk marks:

“LET DOROTHY GO TO THE CITY OF EMERALDS”

The little old woman took the slate from her nose, and having read the words on it, asked, “Is your name Dorothy, my dear?”

“Yes,” answered the child, looking up and drying her tears.

Who was communicating with the Good Witch of the North? Who knew Dorothy’s name?

It’s possible that this is supposed to be a spirit of some kind. “Slate writing” had been a part of the Spiritualism movement, with which L. Frank Baum would likely have been familiar.

However, we don’t get a lot of communicating with the dead in Oz (or appearances of ghosts).

One possible clue is that the writing is in white letters…and white is the color of witches in Oz. Even the fact that Dorothy’s gingham dress has white checks in it marks her as a witch:

When Boq saw her silver shoes he said, “You must be a great sorceress.”

“Why?” asked the girl. “Because you wear silver shoes and have killed the Wicked Witch. Besides, you have white in your frock, and only witches and sorceresses wear white.”

“My dress is blue and white checked,” said Dorothy, smoothing out the wrinkles in it.

“It is kind of you to wear that,” said Boq. “Blue is the color of the Munchkins, and white is the witch color. So we know you are a friendly witch.”

Could Glinda have been the author of the recommendation that Dorothy be sent to see the Wizard? How would she know Dorothy’s name at that point?

One of Glinda’s specialties is surveillance and knowledge. She talks later on about having “spies” (who gather intelligence on the Wizard…it’s clear that Glinda wasn’t exactly loyal to the Wonderful Wizard).

More importantly, she has the Great Book of Records:

“Among the many wonderful things in Glinda’s palace is the Great Book of Records. In this book is inscribed everything that takes place in all the world, just the instant it happens; so that by referring to its pages Glinda knows what is taking place far and near, in every country that exists.”

While it appears that events can be magically blocked from appearing in the Book (Mombi does that with the location of the rightful ruler of Oz, Ozma), it should have been possible for Glinda to know instantly that “Dorothy Gale’s house has landed on and killed the Wicked Witch of the East” (or some entry like that). It’s also reasonable to assume that you have to be looking for something specific, since the book must be constantly changing with new information.

We don’t hear about the magical slate in later books, but some magic in Oz is limited as the number of times it can be used. Perhaps this was a single use device, or was on its last use.

When Dorothy does meet Glinda towards the end of the first book, we don’t get any indication that Glinda is surprised by her arrival (even though she might not have consulted the Book of Records about it, if she didn’t know what had been happening).

Strategically, Dorothy’s visit works very well for Glinda and her alliance.

The Wicked Witch of the East is killed. Dorothy is armed with a powerful charm, and sent to see the Wizard. The Wicked Witch of the West is killed. The Wizard ends up leaving Oz, ending his reign. Two powerful potential weapons, the silver shoes and the Golden Cap that controls the flying monkeys, are both made harmless.

What does Glinda do with Dorothy, an Outsider and possible loose end (who still has the silver shoes when she meets her)?

She sends her back to Kansas…in such a way that the magical shoes no longer are going to be part of the calculations as the power shifts in Oz.

Glinda will end up being a very powerful advisor to Princess Ozma, who she helps regain her throne.

Dorothy’s house: meteorological accident, or calculated coup? The evidence points to the latter.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.

My take on…42

April 14, 2013

My take on…42

42 is not a baseball movie.

Yes, it’s a movie that loves baseball, and shows us baseball…but it’s a movie about people.

The fact that I use the plural there is part of what makes the movie good.

Certainly, it’s the story of Jackie Robinson, and Chadwick Boseman (of Persons Unknown) is great in the part. You can see what a hero is: not somebody who thinks they are a hero, or who chooses to be a hero, but who does the right thing for others, no matter how much it costs personally.

However, it’s also the story of Branch Rickey (played by Harrison Ford, in a Supporting actor Oscar worthy performance), the baseball executive who made the decision to break Major League Baseball’s color barrier…knowing it would be hard, knowing it would be a long, hard fought struggle.

That might be enough of a dynamic, but director (and screenwriter) Brian Helgeland gives us a rich cast of characters.

In fact, I want to take a moment to praise Helgeland’s direction. One of the ways you can tell if something is well-directed is if there is a consistency of vision, and an evenness of tone. Are the actors all working towards the same goal? Are performances there to help the story?

In this case, absolutely. There isn’t a bad or showboaty performance in the movie…from the smallest parts to the largest.

The art direction and costumes also fit right into it.

If this movie was released in November, I could see it garnering several Oscar nominations. With the release being this early in the year, though, that will be more of a challenge.

My Significant Other thought this was the best movie we’ve seen this year, and the audience seemed to enjoy it. I liked the old-fashioned, pure movie tone…no nudity, no gore, just story-telling. You do hear the “n word” (repeatedly, but appropriately), and the “s word” is used once. I thought it moved along nicely, but I can see how some people might find it…too quiet. There certainly is drama (even though we know how it eventually turns out), but not a lot of dramatic incidents.

I recommend this one…and think that it might end up being shown in schools.

This post by Bufo Calvin originally appeared in the The Measured Circle.


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 274 other followers

%d bloggers like this: